Documentation Culture: Why It's Essential for Remote Teams
An organizational practice where important decisions, processes, and knowledge are systematically written down and made accessible to all team members, reducing reliance on synchronous communication and institutional knowledge.
Documentation culture is the practice of writing down and systematically organizing everything from processes and decisions to onboarding guides and meeting notes. For remote teams, this is critical because team members work across different time zones and can’t rely on tapping someone on the shoulder for answers.
Companies like GitLab exemplify documentation culture at its best. With over 2,000 pages in their public handbook, GitLab documents everything from how to expense a meal to how major product decisions are made. This allows their 1,300+ all-remote team members across 65+ countries to find answers independently, make informed decisions, and onboard without constant hand-holding.
When done well, documentation culture reduces meeting time, prevents knowledge silos, enables async work, and creates institutional memory that survives employee turnover.
documentation-culture
Documentation culture is an organizational practice where teams systematically write down and share important information, processes, decisions, and knowledge in accessible, searchable formats. Rather than keeping critical information in people’s heads or in private Slack threads, companies with strong documentation cultures make “write it down” the default response. This shift from oral tradition to written knowledge sharing is what enables distributed teams to function effectively without requiring everyone to be online simultaneously.
- Reduces synchronous dependency: Team members can find answers to questions without waiting for someone in another time zone to wake up, decreasing reliance on real-time communication by up to 60% in well-documented organizations
- Preserves institutional knowledge: When employees leave, their knowledge doesn’t leave with them—documented processes, decisions, and context remain accessible to current and future team members
- Accelerates onboarding: New hires can self-serve answers to common questions and understand how the company works without monopolizing senior team members’ time, reducing onboarding time by 30-40%
- Improves decision quality: Written documentation forces clearer thinking and creates a paper trail that helps teams understand why decisions were made, even months or years later
- Enables scaling: As teams grow, documentation prevents the “broken telephone” effect where information gets distorted as it passes from person to person, ensuring everyone has access to the same source of truth
Signs of Strong Documentation Culture
A company with strong documentation culture exhibits specific behaviors and characteristics that set it apart from organizations where knowledge remains siloed:
Default to transparency: Information is documented publicly (within the company) unless there’s a specific reason to keep it private. The burden of proof is on privacy, not openness.
Documentation is kept current: Old, outdated docs are regularly pruned or updated. Teams assign “documentation owners” who are responsible for keeping specific pages accurate and relevant.
Leaders model the behavior: Executives and managers consistently document their decisions, meeting notes, and thinking processes, setting the standard for the rest of the organization.
Easy discoverability: Documentation is organized logically with good search functionality, clear navigation, and consistent formatting. People can actually find what they need without asking someone where it lives.
Write-first decisions: Major decisions start with written proposals or RFCs (requests for comment) rather than meetings. Discussion happens asynchronously first, with synchronous time reserved for true collaboration or final decisions.
Documentation is valued work: Creating and maintaining documentation is seen as real work, not a chore to do “when you have time.” It’s built into project timelines and performance reviews.
Tools for Documentation
The right tools make documentation culture easier to implement and maintain. Here are the most popular platforms remote teams use:
Notion: An all-in-one workspace that combines docs, wikis, databases, and project management. Its flexibility makes it popular with startups and mid-size companies. Teams appreciate its clean interface, powerful search, and ability to create interconnected knowledge bases. Pricing starts free for individuals with paid plans from $8/user/month.
Confluence: Atlassian’s documentation platform integrates tightly with Jira and other development tools, making it a favorite for engineering teams. Its page hierarchy structure works well for complex organizational knowledge. It offers robust permissions, version history, and templates. Pricing starts at $5.16/user/month for up to 10 users.
GitLab: Beyond version control, GitLab’s built-in wiki and handbook features make it a documentation powerhouse for technical teams. GitLab’s own company handbook is built on GitLab, showcasing the platform’s capabilities. Free for public repositories, paid plans start at $29/user/year.
Slite: Designed specifically for remote teams, Slite focuses on making documentation quick and painless. It offers smart search, verification badges for up-to-date docs, and integration with common tools. Its simpler interface appeals to teams overwhelmed by Notion’s flexibility. Pricing starts at $8/user/month.
Other notable tools: Coda (combines docs with apps), Slab (knowledge base focus), and Document360 (customer-facing documentation). The best tool depends on your team size, technical sophistication, and existing tech stack.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do you get team members to actually maintain documentation?
Make documentation part of the workflow, not an afterthought. Build "update the docs" into your definition of done for projects. Assign documentation owners for key processes. Most importantly, celebrate good documentation—share examples in team meetings and recognize people who maintain excellent docs. When leaders consistently ask "where is this documented?" instead of answering questions directly, the behavior spreads.
What should we document vs. what should we leave to verbal communication?
Document anything that will need to be referenced again, affects multiple people, or represents a decision. This includes processes, how-tos, decisions and their context, onboarding materials, and meeting notes with action items. Casual conversation, quick status updates, and genuine brainstorming are fine to leave undocumented. When in doubt, document it—you can always delete it later, but you can't retrieve an undocumented conversation from three months ago.
How detailed should documentation be?
Detailed enough that someone unfamiliar with the topic can understand it, but not so detailed that it becomes overwhelming to maintain. Use the "future you" test: if you read this six months from now, would you understand it? Include context for decisions, not just what was decided. Link liberally to related docs rather than duplicating information. Start with the essential information and add detail based on questions people ask.
How do you prevent documentation from becoming outdated?
Assign owners to important documents who are responsible for keeping them current. Add "last reviewed" dates and set calendar reminders to review key docs quarterly. Build documentation updates into project completion checklists. Consider using verification badges or "freshness indicators" that show when docs were last validated. Most importantly, create a culture where people feel empowered to update docs they notice are wrong, not just report the problem.